# Z1DA--B170 Window Recaulking Services

Notice 339a41df4f48414f910763ce75612192 (solicitation 36C25627Q0022) from VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF, 256-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 16 (36C256), posted 2026-10-05, responses due 2026-10-23T15:00:00.000Z. Status: open.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Notice ID | 339a41df4f48414f910763ce75612192 |
| Solicitation number | 36C25627Q0022 |
| Type | Solicitation |
| Agency | VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF |
| Sub-tier | VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF |
| Office | 256-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 16 (36C256) |
| Posted | 2026-10-05T15:42:39.000Z |
| Response deadline (UTC) | 2026-10-23T15:00:00.000Z |
| Set-aside | Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside (FAR 19.14) |
| NAICS | 561210 |
| PSC | Z1DA |
| Place of performance | Little Rock, AR, USA |
| Award | - |

## Description

This is 100$ SDVOSB set-aside. Proposal Format and Evaluation: Proposal size will be limited as shown and font/size shall be Arial 11. Title pages, headers, and exhibits do not count towards the page limitations. If these page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit will not be read or considered. Offerors shall submit 1 (one) email. Email shall include a consolidated PDF file, no larger than 10mb, as an attachment, outlining each factor, as listed below: Email Requirements: Subject Line: Company Name, 36C25627Q0022 See Proposal Submission Requirements in the table below. VOL FACTOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I Factor 1 Submission Requirement: Material to satisfy Subfactor 1a criteria outlined below. Material to satisfy Subfactor 1b criteria outlined below. Factor 2 Submission Requirement: Offeror Shall provide a minimum of one (1) and a maximum of five (5) projects completed within the last five (5) years similar in size, complexity, and scope to this project. Factor 3 Price Submission Requirement: Signed 1442 and Amendments Completed Schedule of Offer Items Definitions: Recent - with in past five (5) years from the date of solicitation issuance Relevant - for purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as completed in a clinical, hospital or other medical related use space similar in size and scope to this project. Evaluation Factors Factor I (Approach Quality Management Technical Factor), Factor II (Professional Qualifications & Specialized Experience Technical Factor), and Factor III (Past Performance) are equal in importance. Factors I, II, and III, when combined, are approximately equal in importance to Factor IV (Price). FACTOR 1 APPROACH QUALITY MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL FACTOR SUBFACTORS: Subfactor 1a Management Approach Narrative/Schedule Subfactor 1b Quality Management The following subfactors are in descending order of importance: Subfactor 1a Management Approach Narrative/Schedule: Instructions: Offeror shall demonstrate/explain how this project will be accomplished, based on the offeror s best interpretation of the solicitation documents. Offeror shall provide techniques for maintaining on-time schedule performance and provide a detailed explanation as to how the project will be implemented and managed to ensure compliance with all OSHA Construction Standards, Fire and Life Safety Issues, and Security Measures. Offeror shall provide a schedule with critical path based off a fictional NTP date of 1/1/2027. Subfactor 1b Quality Management: Instructions: Offeror shall specify the roles/positions responsible for quality management & explain the authority those individual(s) have to ensure quality work is provided. Offeror shall provide a detailed explanation of proposed quality control techniques for compliance with the solicitation requirements. Offeror shall provide a narrative on how quality issues are managed and resolved for construction projects. Evaluation Methodology: The VA will evaluate Management Approach, and Quality Management to determine if the offeror understands the complexity and risk mitigation of performing all the required tasks included in this construction project. This technical factor will be evaluated for the offeror s interpretation of the solicitation technical areas outlined in the drawings, specifications, SOW, and evaluation factor criteria. The offeror s narratives should provide enough detail to demonstrate that the scope and complexity of the project requirements are understood and will be successfully completed. FACTOR 2 PAST PERFORMANCE Projects must demonstrate an offeror s experience as a prime contractor managing multiple subcontractors. Project(s) shall have a minimum construction value of between $25,000 and $100,000 and be 100% completed/or ongoing (>50% complete). The offeror s submission should include at a minimum: Project Title Project Location (Physical Address) Contract Type (Example: Design-Build, Design-Bid-Build, Service, Construction) Project Owner s Name & Current Contact Information Brief Description of the Scope of Work (highlight recent/relevant factors) Identify Project Prime Contractor and Major Subcontractors Project Start & Completion Date Project Original Contract Award Amount & Final Award Amount For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the whole contract shall not be submitted as a project; rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a single task order as a project to demonstrate recent/relevancy. If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant past performance should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared past performance, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors who fail to submit past performance for all Joint Venture partners may be rated lower. Evaluation Methodology:Â Past performance will be evaluated based on the projects provided by the offeror, and performance information from government databases. Focus will be on recent and relevant construction contracts that are comparable in size, scope, and complexity. The Intent of this evaluation is to evaluate the demonstrated ability to successfully complete comparable requirements, ensuring they have the experience and capability to deliver quality results on time, within budget, and incompliance with project specifications. The following Performance Relevancy definitions apply: Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/Past Performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Relevant Present/Past Performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Somewhat Relevant Present/Past Performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Not Relevant Present/Past Performance effort involved little or none of 

## Sources

- View on SAM.gov: https://sam.gov/opp/339a41df4f48414f910763ce75612192/view
- Data as of 2026-11-14. Source: https://sam.gov/data-services/Contract%20Opportunities/datagov

## Cite this

"Z1DA--B170 Window Recaulking Services, SAM.gov contract opportunity 339a41df4f48414f910763ce75612192." samgovapi.io, https://samgovapi.io/opportunity/339a41df4f48414f910763ce75612192, data as of 2026-11-14. Primary record: https://sam.gov/opp/339a41df4f48414f910763ce75612192/view

## API and MCP

- REST: GET https://samgovapi.io/api/v1/opportunities/339a41df4f48414f910763ce75612192
- MCP tool: get_opportunity

Independent. Not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by GSA, SAM.gov or any U.S. government agency. Registering in SAM.gov is free at sam.gov.

Get a free API key: https://samgovapi.io/sign-up?ref=ai-claudebot